Custom Search

Family Research Council is Fervently Anti-Gay

Saturday, October 03, 2009

By Media Matters

Even before its baseless attacks on Kevin Jennings, the right-wing Family Research Council had a long history of anti-gay rhetoric and activity.

The Family Research Council Was Founded To Promote Marriage, Family, "And The Sanctity Of Human Life."  According to its website, "Family Research Council (FRC) was founded in 1983 as an organization dedicated to the promotion of marriage and family and the sanctity of human life in national policy." [, accessed 10/1/09]

FRC's Extreme Position On Homosexuality

FRC: Homosexuality Is Unnatural And Harmful To Society.  According to its website, the "Family Research Council believes that homosexual conduct is harmful to the persons who engage in it and to society at large, and can never be affirmed.  It is by definition unnatural, and as such is associated with negative physical and psychological health effects." [, accessed 10/1/09]

FRC: "There Is No Convincing Evidence That A Homosexual Identity Is Ever Something Genetic Or Inborn."  The FRC position on homosexuality includes: "While the origins of same-sex attractions may be complex, there is no convincing evidence that a homosexual identity is ever something genetic or inborn. We oppose the vigorous efforts of homosexual activists to demand that homosexuality be accepted as equivalent to heterosexuality in law, in the media, and in schools." [, accessed 10/1/09]...(Remainder.)


Right-Wing Media Lynch Mob Gay-Baits White House, Facts be Damned

By Karl Frisch
Media Matters

For the better part of a week, conservatives in the media have been on a witch hunt for Kevin Jennings, the director of the Department of Education's Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools. Led by Fox News, the right-wing media have claimed that 21 years ago, when Jennings was a 24-year-old teacher at Concord Academy in Massachusetts, he "cover[ed] up statutory rape" by not reporting to authorities a conversation he had with a student who told him about being involved with an "older man."

The attacks on Jennings, the latest Obama administration official in the right's crosshairs, have been disgusting, misleading, baseless, and at times pointedly anti-gay.

WorldNetDaily's Erik Rush called Jennings a "radical homosexual druggie." The conservative Washington Times contended in an editorial that "Jennings has made extremely radical statements promoting homosexuality in schools." Right-wing radio's big kahuna, Rush Limbaugh, and Fox News' Sean Hannity both claimed that Jennings supported promoting homosexuality in the schools, while conservative blogger Michelle Malkin wrote that Jennings was a "controversial homosexual rights' advocate" who founded a "controversial" organization that "aggressively pushes sexually explicit" books.

The controversial organization of which Malkin speaks? GLSEN -- the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network -- which, according to the organization's website, is "the leading national education organization focused on ensuring safe schools for all students. ... GLSEN envisions a world in which every child learns to respect and accept all people, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity/expression."...(Remainder.)


Conservative Traitors Revel in Obama's Olympic Bid Failure

By Sam Stein
The Huffington Post

Chicago's failed bid to host the 2016 Olympics in the first round of voting caps a week of conservative attacks against President Obama for personally stumping on his home city's behalf.

How the International Olympic Committee's rejection of the Windy City's bid affects the politics surrounding Obama's trip to Copenhagen remains to be seen. But in the immediate aftermath, it has provided ample fodder for Republicans to further accuse the president of having wasted his time, skirted his responsibilities, and acted as a crony for some of his big-moneyed donors.

Upon being informed of the news, a gathering of conservatives at the Americans For Prosperity -- one of the main organizing groups behind the tea party protests -- erupted in applause. They cheered once more after they were told that Chicago had been eliminated during the first round of voting. The moment was captured on video (below) and reported by Hotline On Call:



Mission Not Accomplished

By Paul Krugman
The New York Times

Stocks are up. Ben Bernanke says that the recession is over. And I sense a growing willingness among movers and shakers to declare “Mission Accomplished” when it comes to fighting the slump. It’s time, I keep hearing, to shift our focus from economic stimulus to the budget deficit.

No, it isn’t. And the complacency now setting in over the state of the economy is both foolish and dangerous.

Yes, the Federal Reserve and the Obama administration have pulled us “back from the brink” — the title of a new paper by Christina Romer, who leads the Council of Economic Advisers. She argues convincingly that expansionary policy saved us from a possible replay of the Great Depression.

But while not having another depression is a good thing, all indications are that unless the government does much more than is currently planned to help the economy recover, the job market — a market in which there are currently six times as many people seeking work as there are jobs on offer — will remain terrible for years to come.

Indeed, the administration’s own economic projection — a projection that takes into account the extra jobs the administration says its policies will create — is that the unemployment rate, which was below 5 percent just two years ago, will average 9.8 percent in 2010, 8.6 percent in 2011, and 7.7 percent in 2012....(Remainder.)


Maggie “Homophobic Cow” Gallagher's Anti-Biblical Marriage

By Timothy Kincaid
Box Turtle Bulletin

Maggie Gallagher, as the head of the National Organization for Marriage, is quite fond of extolling the virtues of "traditional marriage." And, for those uncertain as to what "traditional" means, her protege Carrie Prejean, lets us know that it is marriage which is "biblically correct."

Well, when I was growing up in a "biblically correct" family, one of the scriptures often quoted to Christian kids of dating age was 2 Corinthians 6:14
Do not be yoked together with unbelievers. For what do righteousness and wickedness have in common? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness? What harmony is there between Christ and Belial? What does a believer have in common with an unbeliever? What agreement is there between the temple of God and idols?
And lest any kids have any uncertainty about the application of that scripture or the meaning of "unequally yoked", they were told in no uncertain terms that they were to only date other Christian kids. Marrying a non-Christian would be tragic.

It's un-Biblical!
It's un-traditional!
It's Maggie's marriage!

It turns out that for the last 17 years, Maggie has been married to Raman Srivastav, who just happens to be Hindu. Oh, my.

Well I guess we now know why Maggie un-traditionally uses her maiden name and why her husband is kept invisible....(Remainder.)


Federal Judge: Prop 8 Campaign Must Release Campaign Data

By Lisa Leff
Associated Press via CBS 13 Sacramento

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) ― The sponsors of California's same-sex marriage ban must hand over some internal campaign records to lawyers seeking to overturn the voter-enacted initiative, a federal judge in San Francisco ruled Thursday.

Denying a request to shield the information, U.S. District Chief Judge Vaughn Walker said the Protect Marriage campaign had failed to show that providing private e-mails, memos and reports would inhibit the political activities of gay marriage opponents or subject them to unbridled harassment.

"The First Amendment qualified privilege proponents seek to invoke, unlike the attorney-client privilege, for example, is not an absolute bar against disclosure," Walker wrote in an 18-page order. "Rather, the First Amendment qualified privilege requires a balancing of the plaintiffs' need for the information sought against proponents' constitutional interests in claiming the privilege."

The judge agreed with lawyers for two unmarried same-sex couples who have sued to strike down the ban, known as Proposition 8, that confidential communications between the campaign's leaders and professional consultants could reveal a rationale for denying gays the right to wed that is relevant to the case.

The lawsuit argues that the measure was motivated by hostility toward gays and as such must be struck down as inconsistent with the U.S. Constitution's guarantee of equality....(Remainder.)


Pathetic Piece of Shit Kudlow LIES About Health Insurance Mandates

By Media Matters

On his CNBC show, Larry Kudlow distorted a provision in the health care reform bill proposed by Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT) to claim that "if an individual opts out of this insurance plan ... apparently they face a $25,000 fine, or imprisonment, or both." In fact, the bill would levy a $1,900 "excise tax" on those who don't purchase health insurance; those who refuse to pay the tax could face a fine or prison sentence, as the Wall Street Journal editorial Kudlow cited as the source of his claim clearly stated....(Remainder.)


Diarrhea for Brains & Neo-Nazi, Limbaugh, Moronically Says Obama Destroying Western Civilization


Drug Addicted Corporatist Spooge Bucket, Limbaugh, Doesn't Believe People are Dying from Lack of Insurance


Cheney's Demon Cunt Offspring Thinks President "Blaming America First"


Chris Matthews Calls Newsmax Coup Fantasy "Looney Tunes"


Keith Olbermann Name Lou Dobbs WPITW for Pushing Bullshit Breitbart Claims of Praying to Obama


Keith Olbermann Slams Newsmax Coup Article, Cites Media Matters Report on RNC Connection


Moronic Screeching Howler Monkey Malkin Advances Bizarre Conspiracy Theory About Obama and Olympics


Michele "Glenn Beck in Drag" Bachmann Insanely Warns of Abortion Field Trips on House Floor


Right-Wing Ass-Monkey, Rep. Ted Poe, Vomits Up Debunked Czar Attacks


Lonesome Roads Beck Lamely Tries to Respond to Behar's Scathing Criticism


Rachel Maddow: Republicans Pretending to be Champions of Medicare

By Heather
Crooks and Liars

Rachel Maddow and Sen. Bernie Sanders discuss the GOP's hypocrisy when now claiming to be the great champions of Medicare after years of railing against it.
MADDOW: Belated salvo in the scare the bejesus out of elderly voters so they‘ll put you back in power regardless of whether you‘re telling the truth war is an editorial in the conservative newspaper, “The Washington Times,” and it screams “Death Panels by Proxy”—ostensibly argues that the so-called Baucus bill on health reform encourages doctors to withhold health care from Medicare patients. Health care reform is a secret plot to kill people on Medicare.

This is now become an ongoing strategic conundrum. How do you plan to win an argument with opponents who are undeterred by being disproven? Undeterred by the facts, when you don‘t even believe that they believe what they‘re arguing anymore?

It‘s not even just the “death panels” nonsense now. Take Medicare itself, a program Republicans have railed against since before President Johnson signed it into law in 1965. They railed against it since then until—well, until now.

Now, in the Senate Finance Committee, Republicans are trying to portray themselves as the champions of Medicare. They‘re fighting hard to kill any bill that contains any cuts in Medicare, even though people who support Medicare like, say, the AARP, say those cuts won‘t affect care.

Republicans defending Medicare. What would Ronald Reagan say? These guys do remember Ronald Reagan, don‘t they?

Here‘s what he did say about Medicare when it was just a twinkle in some socialist, fascist, freedom-hating, community-organizing Democrat‘s eye....


The Anger of the Festering Frings

By Roger Ebert
Chicago Sun-Times

I've had these thoughts for some time, but have been reluctant to express them. Now so many others have voiced them that it's pointless to remain silent. I am frightened by the climate of insane anti-Obama hatred in this country. I'm not referring to traditional conservatives or Republicans. They're part of the process. I'm speaking of the lunatic fringe, the frothers, the extremist rabble who are sweeping up the ignorant and credulous into a bewildering and fearsome tide of reckless rhetoric.

There have always been nuts. Remember when the John Birch society thought Kennedy was a communist? In those innocent days most of the American people were reasonable. They'd shake their heads in wonder at such a weird notion. Kennedy might be one of those liberals, but he wasn't a commie. And when people said Johnson murdered Kennedy? Also ridiculous. But slowly, ominously, things began to change. After his death, it was said that Edward Kennedy was a Soviet agent. These theories have rabid subscribers.
Obama is a Muslim. Obama was born in Kenya. Obama was a terrorist. Obama will destroy Medicare. Obama will kill your grandmother. Obama is a racist. Obama wants atheism taught in the schools. Obama wants us to pay for the health care of illegal immigrants.
These beliefs are held by various segments of our population. They are absurd. Any intelligent person can see they are absurd. It is not my purpose here to debate them, because such debates are futile. With the zealous True Believers there is no debating. They feed upon loops within loops of paranoid surmises, inventions which are passed along as fact. Sometimes those citing them don't even seem to care if you believe them. Sometimes they may not believe them themselves. The purpose is to fan irrational hatred against our president.

What are we to make of the recent suggestion on the "respected" right-wing site NewsMax, later withdrawn, that "it might not be such a bad thing" if the U. S. military rose up and overthrew Obama in a coup? That sort of talk belongs on a password-protected neo-Nazi or Klan site, not in a place where ostensibly intelligent people look for information. Where were the editors? What did they think? If they're "conservatives," do they support the overthrow of our government by a coup?...(Remainder.)


Daily Show: Democratic Strategists are 'Thinking Three Failures Ahead'

By David Edwards and Muriel Kane
The Raw Story

The Daily Show's Jon Stewart is outraged that the Democratic Party can't seem to pass meaningful health care reform even with a super-majority in Congress.

"Three years ago, the Democrats in our federal government lived in legislative exile," Stewart began. "But all that changed in 2006 when the Democrats regained control of this nation's House of Representatives and its Senate."

"And with that control," he went on, "they still failed ... to get anything. Basically, the Democrats seem like the kind of people who switch to Geico and lose money."

"But it's really only because until recently they didn't have that one thing that would finally allow them to execute their agenda," Stewart continued more hopefully. He played a series of clips from earlier this year of tv news reporters predicting that with the election of Sen. Al Franken, there would be a "Democratic Super Majority" which "Republicans would be powerless to stop" and which would give Obama "the power to steamroll his agenda through the Senate."

After that buildup, Stewart appeared dumbfounded that the Democrats were still unable to get a public option for health care through the Senate Finance Committee....(Remainder.)



All material is the copyright of the respective authors. The purveyor of this blog has made and attempt, whenever possible, to credit the appropriate copyright holder.

  © Blogger template Newspaper by 2008

Back to TOP